Drug Distribution Attorney in Des Moines
Felony-Level Defense for Iowa Delivery & Distribution Charges
A drug distribution charge isn’t a stepped-up version of possession. Under Iowa law, it’s a felony offense that carries mandatory minimum sentences and, at higher quantities, can mean decades in prison. The defense strategy is fundamentally different, and the margin for error is narrower. At McEnroe, Steinbach, Rothman & Kendell P.C., we’ve been defending clients in Polk County criminal courts for more than 35 years, and we know what these cases demand.
Don’t wait to speak with an attorney. What you say to law enforcement before consulting counsel can be used against you, and the time immediately after an arrest is when your options are most open.
Contact McEnroe, Steinbach, Rothman & Kendell P.C. now for a free consultation on your drug distribution charge. We offer after-hours intake answering, flexible payment plans, and in-person or virtual meetings so you can reach us quickly, whatever your situation. Call (515) 516-3745 to speak with our team.Why Des Moines Defendants Choose McEnroe, Steinbach, Rothman & Kendell P.C.
Since 1988, our attorneys have practiced in the courts where your case will be heard. That’s more than three decades of familiarity with Polk County judges, prosecutors, and the local dynamics that shape how drug distribution cases move through the system. We’ve handled cases that reached the Iowa Supreme Court, and criminal defense has been at the center of our practice throughout.
Facing a felony charge also means facing financial pressure. We accept credit cards and offer payment plans so cost isn’t what stands between you and strong representation. Our after-hours intake answering means you don’t have to wait until Monday morning after a weekend arrest. We represent clients throughout Polk County and the greater Des Moines area.
Talk to a Drug Distribution Attorney in Des Moines Today
A free consultation is available by phone or through our online contact form, and meetings can be held in person or virtually. Call (515) 516-3745 or reach out online to get started.
-
Get Started
-
Case Results
-
Testimonials
-
Our Attorneys
What Our Clients Are Saying
-
“I engaged Gary as counsel for a legal matter. His counsel and insight were invaluable and helped me bring the matter to a successful close.”- Doug A.
-
“Frank did a great Job representing me, he was able to get my case dismissed without even going to court!”- Matt H.
-
“Very professional and made sure I understood what was going on throughout the whole process.”- Holly T.
-
“Very knowledgeable and really seem to care about you. I would highly recommend using this firm.”- Jimmy K.
-
“Frank always goes above and beyond to help with any need I may have. From advice to being my attorney. I will always use him and recommend him for all legal needs.”- Derek M.
-
“I have used Frank a couple of times, and he has always been up front with me. He works hard to get you the best deal. Frank communicates with you, even if it seems like a stupid question, he will listen and tell you the best way to handle your problems.”- Ryan B.
-
“Great experience with the McEnroe Law firm. They ask good questions to answer my problem. I feel very satisfied with my solution. You should contact them to solve your issue.”- Eric R.
-
“Frank Steinbach has been my go-to attorney for both personal and business matters for years. He has a wealth of knowledge and information, but his guidance has always been spot on in the times that I've really needed it.”- Adrienne A.
Defense Strategies for Drug Distribution Charges in Des Moines
The prosecution must prove every element of a distribution offense beyond a reasonable doubt, including both possession and the intent to deliver. Establishing reasonable doubt on any single element can affect how a case resolves. Our attorneys analyze every detail of the arrest and the prosecution’s evidence to identify the strongest available defense.
Fourth Amendment Suppression
If law enforcement obtained the drugs through an unlawful search or seizure, the evidence may be suppressible under the Fourth Amendment. Courts may exclude evidence when a K9 sniff improperly prolonged a traffic stop, when officers lacked valid probable cause before deploying a drug detection dog, when a search warrant affidavit contained errors or omissions, or when police exceeded the scope of a valid warrant. When the drugs themselves are suppressed, the prosecution’s case may be significantly weakened.
Challenging Intent to Deliver
Being found with a controlled substance doesn’t automatically establish distribution. A defendant may be able to argue that the quantity and circumstances are consistent with personal use rather than distribution, attacking the intent element without disputing possession. This is a distinct legal argument that requires careful analysis of the evidence prosecutors plan to rely on.
Constructive Possession & Shared-Space Cases
When drugs are found in a shared vehicle or residence, the prosecution must establish that the defendant specifically had control over the area where they were found. Constructive possession is harder to prove than actual possession, and cases involving multiple occupants can present opportunities to create reasonable doubt on this element.
Additional Defenses
Mistaken identity, lack of probable cause for the initial stop, false accusation, and chain of custody failures in how evidence was handled are all grounds our attorneys evaluate in every case. No two drug distribution cases present identical facts, which is why we review the full record before identifying the strongest path forward.