Daniel Rothman argued a violation of 321J.11 occurred regarding the client’s rights to an independent test.  The administrative law judge agreed with our argument and rescinded the OWI revocation from the client’s DOT record.  His DOT history will not even show the charge for the OWI and he will not need SR22 insurance, a breathalyzer or any other obligation.  He can drive just as he did before the OWI.